sarmasti.com

Tag Archives: Van Dam Dragon Eyes 2012

Are You Ready to Get Started in sucess your life

Reach for the Stars

I am here for those of you who are struggling to find success in life. I am offering to help you to find new skills to say yes to your potential. I am very passionate about these gifts of life and to share them with you. The feeling I get in helping someone to find their true potential is priceless.

I am Adrian Reddish who lives in the UK and my aim is to set the seeds to guide you towards the very things that you have always hoped for. I will show you how to find a way to help you reach your goals, allowing you to enjoy the total freedom you have always wanted. I will also introduce you to new skills that will help get you there.

You can also make contact via my contact Adrian page to ask a question or make a comment. Be sure to “like” each page at the top of the right columb. You can also make a facebook comment at the bottom of every page, to share your thoughts with me and your friends.

You will appreciate that this is a process that takes time. But the reward, if you are prepared to work at it, will be well worthwhile and beyond your wildest dreams. So I say to you:

Say YES! to your full potential.

This well known saying puts it, in quite a nice nutshell.

“Inch by inch, everything is a cinch.
Mile by mile, may take a while.”

We will start with a definition and guide you with a bit of dream buildingand goal setting to begin your new journey to:

Find Success in Your Life.

This will involve action on your part because without it nothing at all will happen. You will start to believe “I can do it”. You will also be able to adjust the image you have of yourself. Doing these things will take you forward and allow you to see the person you really are! You could choose to be like the cow in the field chewing the cud, which is do nothing, or choose to drive the Rolls Royce. I know which one I choose, do you?

Here is another saying that I found quite thought provoking. Think on this for a few moments!

“Ships are safe in harbour,
but that’s not what they are designed for”

The question is; what happens to the ship that stays in harbour? Yes that’s right, it rots! We are designed to go out and seek new experiences, find new horizons and discover new fortunes in life.

Talent young illegal immigrants can stay in US: Obama

Washington, June 16 (IANS) In an election-year move hailed bySouth Asian, Latino and other immigrant organisations, PresidentBarack Obama announced that his administration will stop deporting talented young illegal immigrants if they pose no criminal or security threat.

The changes caused by his executive order will make immigration policy “more fair, more efficient and more just,” he said in a White House address Friday afternoon to praise from Latino leaders but outrage from opposition Republicans.

“This is not amnesty. This is not immunity. This is not a path to citizenship. It’s not a permanent fix,” Obama said answering his critics. “This is a temporary stopgap measure.”

Noting children of illegal immigrants ”study in our schools, play in our neighbourhoods, befriend our kids, pledge allegiance to our flag,” Obama said, “It makes no sense to expel talented young people who are, for all intents and purposes, Americans.”

Under the new policy, people younger than 30 who came to the United States before the age of 16, pose no criminal or security threat, and were successful students or served in the military, can get a two-year deferral from deportation.

It also will allow those meeting the requirements to apply for work permits, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said.

The change is part of a department effort to target resources at illegal immigrants who pose a greater threat, such as criminals and those trying to enter the country now, she said.

Republicans who have blocked Democratic efforts on immigration reform immediately condemned the move with Obama’s likely Republican presidential opponent Mitt Romney saying the issue needs more substantive action than an executive order, which can be replaced by a subsequent president.

But members of the National Coalition of South Asian Organizations (NCSO), a network of 42 organizations, applauded Obama’s announcement.

“South Asian youth and families stand to benefit from this change in policy, given that individuals from South Asian countries are among the one million undocumented students in the United States,” it said.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), America’s largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization, also welcomed Obama’s decision.

The move addresses a major concern of the Hispanic community which has been upset over an overall increase in deportations under Obama with some 400,000 illegal immigrants removed last year, the largest in US history.

Obama spares many young illegal immigrants deportation

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants who were brought into the United States as children will be able to avoid deportation and get work permits under an order on Friday by President Barack Obama.

In a move that seemed to be aimed at Hispanics whose enthusiasm for voting in the November 6 election could be crucial to Obama’s re-election chances, the president acted to potentially protect 800,000 people from deportation proceedings for at least two years.

Obama, who previously was reluctant to impose such an order even as Republicans in Congress blocked immigration reform bills he supported, called his action “the right thing to do.”

His announcement was on the 30th anniversary of a Supreme Court decision that said children of illegal-immigrant parents were entitled to public education in the United States.

It allowed Obama, whose administration has faced criticism from some Hispanic groups for deporting about 400,000 illegal immigrants a year, to draw a sharp contrast between himself and Republican Mitt Romney, his opponent in the election. Romney, in trying to appeal to his party’s most conservative voters, has taken a harsh stance against illegal immigration.

Speaking to reporters at the White House, Obama emphasized that his stop-gap policy did not grant amnesty or citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants. He said that such people “are Americans in their hearts and minds; in every single way but one – on paper.”

Both Democrats who praised Obama’s move and Republicans who attacked it agreed that Congress ultimately should decide the permanent fate of immigrants who were brought to the United States illegally by their parents.

Most Republicans continue to clamor for more law enforcement before considering any loosening of immigration rules for the estimated 12 million people who are in the country illegally. Obama emphasized various steps he has taken to secure the southwestern U.S. border, the entry point for most of the immigrants living illegally in the United States.

POWER OF THE PRESIDENCY

Obama’s order was the second time in two months that he has reached out to a key Democratic voting constituency. Last month, he said for the first time that he supports legalizing gay marriages, a move that while largely symbolic, won him praise and campaign donations from the gay and lesbian community.

Friday’s appeal to Hispanics came at a time when Obama’s popularity has dipped amid new worries of a weakening economy and a deepening European financial crisis that further threatens American jobs.

Meanwhile, Republicans in the deeply fractured U.S. Congress have blocked most of Obama’s domestic initiatives, some of which he said would have created millions of jobs.

Obama’s order came a week before he is scheduled to address a meeting of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials in Florida. Romney also is set to address the group next week.

The meeting is likely to feature Florida Senator Marco Rubio, a Republican who has pushed for legislation that would help children of illegal immigrants.

Obama’s order also came as the U.S. Supreme Court is considering a challenge to Arizona’s strict immigration laws that target people living and working in the state illegally. A ruling could come as early as next week.

A ‘POWER GRAB’

Romney, campaigning in New Hampshire, said Obama’s move made it more difficult to reach a long-term solution for young illegal immigrants “who come here through no fault of their own.” He said he would like to see legislation to help such people but did not offer a plan of his own.

Early this year, during the Republican presidential primaries, Romney said he favored “self-deportation” in which illegal immigrants realize they would be better off returning to their native countries after employment restrictions left them unable to find work in the United States.

Other Republicans were more harsh in criticizing Obama.

“Today’s announcement by President Obama is a politically motivated power grab that does nothing to further the debate but instead adds additional confusion and uncertainty to our broken immigration system,” said Obama’s 2008 Republican challenger for the White House, Senator John McCain of Arizona.

Another Republican, House of Representatives Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith, called Obama’s order a “breach of faith” that Smith said will have “horrible consequences” for unemployed Americans who are looking for jobs only to find that illegal immigrants will work for less money.

Some Republicans suggested that Obama’s move could face legal challenges but several law professors said Friday that it is unlikely that Obama’s order could be challenged successfully in court. Presidents have broad executive power for such temporary orders and prosecutorial discretion.

George Washington University law professor Orin Kerr said criminal enforcement is the domain of the executive branch and deportation decisions would fall under that authority.

University of Houston law professor Michael A. Olivas said Friday’s directive is well within a president’s usual authority.

Political analysts cast Obama’s move as a savvy strategy for what could be a very close race for the White House.

“The Obama administration knows it’s in a very tight race and if the margins that it enjoyed among unmarried women, gays, Hispanics and blacks don’t hold, then he might end up on the wrong end of this thing,” said Cal Jillson, a politics professor at Southern Methodist University in Dallas. “So he’s going around and touching all these bases.”

OBAMA’S REVERSAL

Under Obama’s plan, those who qualify would be allowed to live and work in the United States for two years and could be eligible for extensions, the Obama administration said.

U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, who made the initial announcement of Obama’s order on Friday, said that illegal immigrants up to 30 years old who came to the United States as children and do not pose a risk to national security would be eligible to stay in the country and allowed to apply for work permits.

To avoid deportation under Obama’s plan, a person must have come to the United States under the age of 16 and have resided in the country for at least five years.

They must be in school or have graduated from high school or be honorably discharged from the U.S. military. They also must not have been convicted of any felony or significant misdemeanor offenses.

Obama has long supported measures to allow the children of illegal immigrants to study and work in the United States, but efforts to pass such measures in Congress have failed amid objections by Republicans.

The Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act passed the House in 2010, when Democrats controlled that chamber. But it fell a few votes short in the Senate, amid strong Republican opposition.

Friday’s announcement was a victory for Hispanic groups that have long called on Obama to use his executive powers and it marked somewhat of a reversal by the administration. Last July, in a speech to the National Council of La Raza, Obama said he was reluctant to bypass Congress.

There are up to 2 million illegal immigrants who came to the United States as children and who remain in the country, according to immigration group estimates. U.S. officials said the new measures would affect roughly 800,000 people.

Most of the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in the United States are Hispanics. There are now 51 million Hispanics living in the United States out of a total population of 309 million.

Designated Greek finance minister resigns

Vassilis Rapanos, Greece’s finance minister-designate, resigned Monday after being hospitalized for several days even before he could be sworn in to what would likely be one of the more thankless jobs in international finance.

The office of Greek Prime Minister Antonis Samaris said it accepted Rapanos’ resignation after receiving a letter from the ailing official, who is 64. Rapanos had been rushed to the hospital Friday after complaining about dizziness and abdominal pains. He was to be released from hospital on Tuesday, but no further details were available.

His resignation tosses a monkey wrench, for now, into Greek plans to renegotiate the crippling austerity program it agreed to in exchange for aid to prop up its debt-burdened economy.

Samaras himself was released from hospital Monday after undergoing eye surgery to repair a detached retina over the weekend, but will have to stay home for several days.

Rapanos’ resignation came as Germany tamped down expectations that this week’s European Union summit Thursday and Friday would emerge with any significant action on Greece.

The EU summit comes just a week after Greece’s new coalition government was formed following months of political turmoil and two inconclusive elections. It was to have been a key test of Athens’ hopes of renegotiating some of the austerity measures it has agreed to in return for billions of euros in rescue loans from the International Monetary Fund and other European Union nations that use the joint euro currency.

It was to have been preceded by a visit to Athens starting Monday of Greece’s debt inspectors, known as the Troika — representatives from the European Commission, the European Central Bank and the IMF. But that visit was postponed until Samaras can recover.

Without the troika report on Greece’s progress in economic reforms required by its international bailout, Germany said it would be premature to expect any new decisions this week. Samaras has been pressing Greece’s creditors to revise the bailout deal, which is despised by many ordinary Greeks.

Greece will still be present at the EU summit, sending a delegation with outgoing Finance Minister Giorgos Zanias, one of the key negotiators in Greece’s bailout agreement. As Rapanos fell ill before he could be sworn in, Zanias still holds the title.

And the delegation will be led by the country’s president, 83-year-old Karolos Papoulias, the government announced Monday. While the presidency in Greece is a largely ceremonial post, his presence would adhere to EU regulations about summits.

It was unclear when the postponed troika visit would take place.

“First, our concern is for the health of the prime minister and finance minister,” European Commission spokesman Amadeu Altafaj Tardio said in Brussels, adding that debt inspectors would head to Greece “as soon as possible.”

Samaras’ government, comprised of his New Democracy conservatives, their long-time socialist rivals PASOK and the small Democratic Left party, has issued a policy statement outlining changes it would like to make to the terms of its international bailout. Those include repealing certain tax hikes, freezing public sector layoffs and extending by two years the mid-2014 deadline for tough austerity measures.

Whether Greece can amend the terms of its loan agreement will depend on how the proposals are viewed by its international creditors. Germany, the largest single contributor to eurozone bailouts, has repeatedly said Athens must stick to its austerity pledges.

“One thing is clear,” German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said from Luxembourg. “We cannot allow everything to be negotiated again. We can also not allow discounts to be granted. What has been decided upon stands. That the (Greek) election campaigns have cost time is obvious. That’s the situation and we have to deal with it. But the fact remains that the agreements must be implemented.”

Seibert also stressed that Greece must stick to its commitments.

“A program has been agreed upon, a program goes for every government, no matter if it’s a new government, and the program is the best way to see Greece return to economic health,” he said.

In Brussels, Altafaj Tardio also stressed that “Greece has to face its financial obligations,” adding that before any further funds can be disbursed “there has to be a thorough analysis.”

“It’s no secret that there have been delays in several areas of implementation,” he added.

The latest figures released by the finance ministry Monday showed that Greece’s budget deficit for the first five months of the year was better than expected, standing at €10.87 billion ($13.63 billion) instead of the target of €12.89 billion ($16.17 billion) on a modified cash basis.

Revenue, however, was below target with the state budget net revenue standing at €19.67 billion ($24.56 billion), €926 million ($1.15 billion) short of the targeted €20.6 billion ($25.73 billion), due in part to lower domestic consumer demand and lower tax revenues.

The ministry said “this revenue shortfall was more than compensated for by the savings in State Budget expenditures for the first five months of 2012.”

How to dress for success

NEW YORK — Mark Twain once quipped, “Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence in society.”

Good insight. But in a world of “Dress Down Friday,” what’s appropriate to wear to work? In many cases, there are no carved-in-granite rules so when in doubt, go traditional.

“The most basic mistake new employees make is under dressing,” says Randall Hansen, a professor of business at Stetson University in Deland, Fla. “If unsure, dress conservatively. The best way to avoid a problem is to understand the corporate culture.”

To make the right impression at work, remember these basic points when assembling your wardrobe:

1. Presentation counts.

2. Casual shouldn’t mean slovenly.

3. Dress as you want to be seen: Serious, professional, upward-bound.

When putting together your work wardrobe, take the most basic step first: Size up your office. If you want to be a manager, check out what the successful managers wear. Next, check out the office stars. Here’s betting they don’t show up for work in their weekend grubs.

If your office has a written dress code, your problems are solved. If necessary, go shopping with the dress code in hand and you can’t go wrong. But many offices don’t have written standards and it’s up to you to get it right. So, here’s a rule of thumb: Understated beats flash and trash five days a week.

For men, traditional attire includes:

  • A button-down shirt.
  • Polished black shoes.
  • A blue, black or gray jacket.
  • Slacks that complement the jacket.
  • You can’t go wrong with a conservative tie. (This means no pink flamingoes or hula dancers.)

P.S. Don’t forget the socks — buy two dozen pairs of black or blue socks so you can pick two at random from your drawer each morning and always have a match.

There is some wiggle room in this framework. Blue and white shirts have been around since time began, or so it seems, but there’s also room for the occasional, yellow, pink or if you’re an aspiring poet, black shirts. Tread lightly here because if you don’t know what you’re doing, you’re likely to step in it.

For women, the traditional look includes:

  • A skirt that hits just above the knee, slacks and perhaps pantsuits.
  • Simple jewelry.
  • Just a hint of makeup. It’s probably wise to skip the perfume, especially during a job interview or the first few days at a new job.
  • Polished flats or moderate heels.
  • Sweaters.
  • Pantyhose may be the office standard. Ask.

There will be regional differences because what’s standard in the Northeast may be seen as stuffy and impractical in the Southwest.

Remember that you’re not dressing to attract attention at a rowdy bar — you’re dressing to underscore your professionalism and competence. Some don’t understand the difference, or mix the two to the detriment of their careers. Getting it right is especially crucial when interviewing for a job or sitting down to a new one.

“Many recent college grads just have no understanding of a professional wardrobe,” says Hansen. “Up to that point in their lives, extra money has been spent on party clothes. Some think because they look attractive when going out, the same clothes will work in a job interview.”

Write this down, gentlemen: If you borrow a jacket for an interview, make sure it fits. If it’s three sizes too large, you’ll look like a miniature person. Non-verbal cues can speak volumes, especially to a job interviewer.

Like everything else at work, especially when starting a new job, you’re being sized up all the time. Little things count. Some people, especially young workers, overlook this basic point and flub the obvious. How you dress will tell the boss how you see yourself and how you approach the job.

When dressing for your career, remember that you want to be noticed for the quality of your work — not the horrible miscalculation of your duds.

On your first day at a new job, it’s better to over- rather than under-dress. If you dress too formally, a colleague will nudge you in the ribs and say, “Nice outfit, but it’s not necessary unless you’re calling on clients.” That beats the boss thinking that you’re fashion-impaired or, worse, that you don’t take the job seriously.

Remember: Always dress for the task at hand. If you’re a civil engineer headed for a construction site, jeans and work boots are fine, but that’s not how to dress when making a formal presentation to the grand pooh-bahs at the home office.

Appearance can create credibility. You know this from your own experience watching TV interview shows. Think of the number of times experts from opposing sides of an issue have made good points, but you remember what one said simply because that person was better dressed and looked better on the screen.

US Supreme Court cuts parts of Arizona migrant law

Jorge Mendez protests the Arizona immigration law outside the state capitol in Phoenix, Arizona 22 June 2012

The US Supreme Court has backed checks on the immigration status of people stopped or arrested in Arizona, while striking down key parts of a tough law critics branded as racial profiling.

President Barack Obama said he was pleased three challenges were upheld.

But Arizona Governor Jan Brewer said the “heart” of the law would remain.

President Obama and his Republican rival Mitt Romney are each battling for Hispanic votes ahead of November’s presidential election.

Mr Romney reacted quickly to the court’s ruling, criticising Mr Obama for not passing a national immigration reform law.

In a statement, he said each US state has “the duty – and the right – to secure our borders and preserve the rule of law”.

President Barack Obama later said he was “pleased” that some parts of the law had been thrown out by the court.

But he added: “I remain concerned about the practical impact of the remaining provision of the Arizona law that requires local law enforcement officials to check the immigration status of anyone they even suspect to be here illegally.

“No American should ever live under a cloud of suspicion just because of what they look like.”

In other developments at the court on Monday:

  • A ruling on President Obama’s landmark healthcare reform law was scheduled for Thursday
  • The justices rejected mandatory sentencing of juveniles convicted of murder to life in prison without parole
  • The court struck down a Montana campaign finance law that would limit corporate contributions to political campaigns.

‘Held accountable’

The Supreme Court judgement came after the US government argued that the law infringed on federal rights to oversee immigration policy.

Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, South Carolina and Utah have all adopted variations of the Arizona law.

The headline provision, known as Section 2(B), that requires police to make a “reasonable attempt… to determine the immigration status” of anyone who is stopped for another violation, was upheld by the Supreme Court.

US Supreme Court, Washington DC 31 March 2012

The court ruled it was too early to tell whether the clause caused a conflict with federal laws, but added that the provision could be open to legal challenge again at a later date.

The Supreme Court also struck down three other parts of the Arizona immigration law.

One clause would have required immigrants to carry proof of their status with them, and another would have made it a crime for undocumented workers to apply for a job.

The court also struck down a provision that would have allowed police to stop people purely on the suspicion that they were in the country illegally.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wrote the opinion for the court, said the justices were unanimous in their decision to allow the “check your papers” provision to come into effect. The court was divided on other issues.

One justice, Antonin Scalia, who dissented from the case, said he would uphold all parts of the Arizona law, citing the sovereignty of individual states as defined in the US constitution.

Arizona’s Republican governor, Jan Brewer, called the court’s ruling a victory, saying the “heart” of the bill could now come into effect.

In a statement, Ms Brewer said the ruling was a victory for “all Americans who believe in the inherent right and responsibility of states to defend their citizens.

But she added: “Law enforcement will be held accountable should this statute be misused in a fashion that violates an individual’s civil rights.”

Other reaction to the law was nuanced, and at least partly open to interpretation: some claimed victory for backers of the law, while others saw the ruling as a partial victory for the administration.

Immigration has become a key issue as the US edges closer to this year’s presidential election.

President Barack Obama recently outlined a plan to allow hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants who came to the US as children the option of legal status and work permits.

His Republican rival Mitt Romney has opposed Mr Obama’s plan, but has not said how he would address the issue of immigration.

Both men are courting Hispanic votes ahead of their showdown in November.

VAN DAM Dragon eyes 2012 (Full Movie) HD

2 visitors online now
1 guests, 1 bots, 0 members
Max visitors today: 5 at 01:49 am IST
This month: 12 at 05-10-2013 11:35 am IST
This year: 33 at 04-09-2013 07:51 pm IST
All time: 98 at 09-09-2012 06:47 am IST
[Close Ad]
Your Ad Here